藏文版华西心情指数量表的信效度研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Reliability and validity of the Tibetan version of Huaxi Emotional Distress Index
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 研究藏文版的华西心情指数(HEI)量表在藏族群众中的信效度。方法 采用便利 抽样,使用藏文版HEI量表对2018 年10—12 月抽取的500 名藏族群众进行问卷调查,对数据进行探索 性因子分析、Cronbach'sα 系数分析,以对该量表的信度与效度进行评价。结果 (1)效度分析:本量表 可提炼出两个因子,即情绪痛苦与消极观念,累计解释67.8% 的方差。(2)信度分析:本量表9 个条目的 总Cronbach's α 系数为0.89(> 0.7),情绪痛苦因子(1~7 条目)和消极观念因子(8、9 条目)的Cronbach's α 系数分别为0.87 和0.77(均> 0.7)。结论 藏文版HEI 量表在藏族群众中具有比较高的结构效度和内 在信度,可以为其情绪问题的快速筛查提供一定帮助。

    Abstract:

    Objectives To investigate the reliability and validity of the Tibetan version of the Huaxi Emotional Distress Index(HEI) in the Tibetan population. Methods Using convenient sampling, a total of 500 Tibetans were surveyed with the Tibetan version of the HEI from October 2018 to December 2018. The exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's α coefficient analysis were performed to analyze the reliability and validity of the scale. Results In the validity analysis, two factors were extracted from the scale, namely "emotional pain" and "negative concept", explaining 67.8% variance accumulatively; In the reliability analysis, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.89( >0.7) for all nine items of the scale, 0.87 and 0.77( both > 0.7) for "emotional pain" factor( Item 1-7) and "negative concept" factor( Item 8-9). Conclusions The Tibetan version of the HEI scale has high structural validity and intrinsic reliability among the Tibetan population, which can be helpful in the rapid screening of emotional problems.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨梓 来铭枫 刘子涵 徐佳军.藏文版华西心情指数量表的信效度研究[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2019,19(5):
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2019.05.010.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-08-22