心理韧性在急性缺血性脑卒中患者应对方式与抑郁症状评分关系中的调节效应研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Moderating effect of psychological resilience on the relationship between coping styles and depressivesymptom scores in patients with acute ischemic stro
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨心理韧性在急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者应对方式与抑郁症状评分关系中的 调节效应。方法 采用便利抽样法选取南京医科大学附属脑科医院2022 年1 月—2023 年6 月252 例 AIS患者作为研究对象,采用心理韧性量表(CD-RISC)、简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评 估AIS患者心理韧性、应对方式及抑郁情况,采用Pearson相关分析心理韧性、应对方式及抑郁的相关性, 采用分层回归分析心理韧性在AIS 患者应对方式与抑郁关系中的调节效应。结果 AIS 患者CD-RISC 评分为(62.23±10.25)分,其中坚韧性维度条目均分最高,为(2.60±0.48)分;SCSQ评分为(28.04±5.23)分, 其中消极应对维度条目均分最高,为(1.45±0.28)分;SDS 评分为(52.27±10.93)分。Pearson 相关性分 析显示,CD-RISC 评分、力量性维度评分、乐观性维度评分、坚韧性维度评分均与消极应对维度评分及 SDS评分呈负相关,与积极应对维度评分呈正相关(r=-0.681、-0.665、-0.597、-0.504、-0.625、-0.547、 -0.662、-0.612、0.736、0.642、0.681、0.709,均P< 0.05);消极应对维度评分与积极应对维度评分呈负相 关,与SDS评分呈正相关(r=-0.342、0.517,均P<0.05);积极应对维度评分与SDS评分呈负相关(r=-0.552, P < 0.05)。分层回归分析结果显示,模型3 中积极应对与坚韧性的乘积与AIS 患者抑郁存在相关性(t= -3.587,P< 0.001)。结论 AIS患者应对方式与抑郁有关,心理韧性在应对方式与抑郁症状评分间起着调 节效应,积极应对方式有利于减少抑郁症状评分,改善心理韧性能降低AIS患者应对方式所致的抑郁风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the moderating effect of psychological resilience on the relationship between coping styles and depressive symptom scores in patients with acute ischemic stroke( AIS). Methods Convenience sampling was used to select 252 patients with AIS from January 2022 to June 2023 in the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University as study subjects. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Simple Coping Style Questionnaire( SCSQ), and Self-Rating Depression Scale( SDS) were used to assess the psychological resilience, coping styles, and depressive disorder of AIS patients. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between psychological resilience, coping styles, and depressive disorder. Stratified regression was used to analyze the moderating effect of psychological resilience on the relationship between coping styles and depressive symptom in patients with AIS. Results The CD-RISC score of AIS patients was( 62.23±10.25), with the highest mean score of( 2.60±0.48) for the toughness dimension items. The SCSQ score was( 28.04±5.23), with the highest mean score of( 1.45±0.28) for the negative coping dimension items. The SDS score was( 52.27±10.93). Pearson correlation analysis showed that CD-RISC scores, strength dimension scores, optimism dimension scores, and toughness dimension scores were all negatively correlated with negative coping dimension scores and SDS scores, and positively correlated with positive coping dimension scores( r=-0.681, -0.665, -0.597, -0.504, -0.625, -0.547, -0.662, -0.612, 0.736, 0.642, 0.681, 0.709; all P < 0.05), negative coping dimension scores were negatively correlated with positive coping dimension scores and positively correlated with SDS scores( r=-0.342, 0.517; all P < 0.05), and positive coping dimension scores were negatively correlated with SDS scores( r=-0.552, P<0.05), and all of these differences were statistically significant. Stratified regression showed that the product of positive coping and toughness in model 3 was correlated with depressive disorder in AIS patients( t=-3.587, P<0.001). Conclusions Coping styles are associated with depressive disorder in AIS patients, and psychological resilience plays a moderating effect between coping styles and depressive symptom scores. Positive coping styles are beneficial in reducing depressive symptom scores, and improved psychological resilience reduces the risk of depressive disorder due to coping styles in patients with AIS.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

余雨晴,薛冬辉.心理韧性在急性缺血性脑卒中患者应对方式与抑郁症状评分关系中的调节效应研究[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2025,25(6):396-401
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2025.06.003.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-24