NRG1、BDNF基因多态性与老年抑郁症临床症状的关联分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

北京市科技计划-首都临床诊疗技术研究及示范应用项目( Z191100006619105)


Association between NRG1, BDNF gene polymorphism and clinical symptoms of geriatric depressivedisorder
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨神经调节蛋白1(NRG1)的单核苷酸多态性位点(SNP) rs3924999、脑源性神经 营养因子(BDNF)的SNP rs6265与老年抑郁症易感性及临床症状的关联性。方法 选取2021年2— 12月 在首都医科大学附属北京安定医院门诊及病房招募的76 例首发老年抑郁症患者为病例组,同期从北 京地区的社区招募37 名健康老年志愿者为对照组。检测两组NRG1(rs3924999)和BDNF(rs6265)基因 多态性,采用χ2 检验比较基因型分布的组间差异;采用单因素方差分析比较病例组不同基因型分组 的17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)、 广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、失眠严重程度 指数(ISI)、日常生活活动能力量表(ADL)评分的组间差异,多重比较采用Bonferroni法校正。结果 两组 受试者NRG1 rs3924999 基因分布比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.123,P=0.028),经Bonferroni 多重比较 校正后(校正后显著性阈值P=0.025),差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。两组受试者BDNF rs6265 基因型分 布比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.369,P=0.831)。病例组NRG1 rs3924999不同基因型(AA、GA、GG)间 临床症状评分及认知功能评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05);BDNF rs6265 不同基因型(CC、 TC、TT)间MoCA 评分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=3.355,P=0.040),经Bonferroni 法事后多重比较校正, CC 与TC 基因型间的差异有统计学意义(均值差=-3.179,95%CI:-6.19~-0.17,P=0.035)。结论 NRG1 基因rs3924999 位点多态性可能与老年抑郁症易感性有关,BDNF基因rs6265 位点多态性可能与老年抑 郁症的认知障碍有关。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the association between the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3924999 of neuregulin 1( NRG1) and the SNP rs6265 of brain-derived neurotrophic factor( BDNF) with susceptibility to and clinical symptoms of geriatric depressive disorder. Methods The case group consisted of 76 patients with first-episode geriatric depressive disorder recruited from the outpatient clinics and inpatients wards of Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University between February and December 2021. The control group comprised 37 healthy geriatric volunteers recruited from communities in the Beijing during the same period. Genetic polymorphism in the NRG1( rs3924999) and BDNF( rs6265) were analyzed in two groups, and the chi-square test was used to compare differences in genotype distribution between the groups. One-way analysis of variance( ANOVA) was used to compare differences between genotypes within case group and scores of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale( HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Scale( HAMA), 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire( PHQ-9), 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder( GAD-7), Mini-Mental State Examination( MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment( MoCA), Insomnia Severity Index( ISI), and Activities of Daily Living Scale( ADL). Multiple comparisons were corrected using the Bonferroni method. Results There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the NRG1 rs3924999 genotype between the two groups( χ2=7.123, P=0.028); however, after correction for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method (corrected significance threshold P=0.025), the difference was no statistically significant( P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of the BDNF rs6265 genotype between the two groups (χ2=0.369,P=0.831). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical symptom scores or cognitive function scores among different genotypes( AA, GA, GG) of the NRG1 rs3924999 in case group( all P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in MoCA scores among the different BDNF rs6265 genotypes (CC,TC,TT)( F=3.355, P=0.040). After multiple comparison correction using the Bonferroni method, the difference between the CC and TC genotypes was statistically significant[ mean difference=-3.179, 95%CI (-6.19, -0.17), P=0.035]. Conclusions The polymorphism at the rs3924999 locus of the NRG1 gene may be associated with susceptibility to geriatric depressive disorder, while the polymorphism at the rs6265 locus of the BDNF gene may be associated with cognitive impairment in geriatric depressive disorder.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-15